Rosie Huntington-Whiteley Confirmed for TF3
Thursday, June 3rd, 2010 7:58AM CDT
Categories: Movie Related News, People NewsPosted by: Diem Views: 75,903
Topic Options: View Discussion · Sign in or Join to reply
Michael Bay's blog has updated with official confirmation that Rosie Huntington-Whiteley will be starring in Transformers 3.
While she has a wealth of modelling experience including some past work with Michael Bay this will be her first major acting role. It's so far unclear whether she will be playing Mikaela or a new character.
The blogpost can be seen here.
Thanks go to board member Albershide for bringing us the news.
Stick with Seibertron.com for the latest in Transformers movie news!
While she has a wealth of modelling experience including some past work with Michael Bay this will be her first major acting role. It's so far unclear whether she will be playing Mikaela or a new character.
The blogpost can be seen here.
Thanks go to board member Albershide for bringing us the news.
Stick with Seibertron.com for the latest in Transformers movie news!
Credit(s): Albershide, Michaelbay.com
News Search
Got Transformers News? Let us know here!
Most Popular Transformers News
Most Recent Transformers News
News Categories: Toy News, Movie Related News, Cartoon News, Comic Book News, Site News, Rumors, Event News, Digital Media News, Collectables, Sponsor News, Game News, Site Articles, Store News, Reviews, People News, Company News, Sightings, Press Releases, Unlicensed Products News, Auctions, Transtopia, Interviews, Editorials, Collector's Club News, Knock Offs, Podcast, Heavy Metal War, Contests, Book News, Top Lists
Re: Rosie Huntington-Whiteley Confirmed for TF3 (1081629)
Posted by RiddlerJ on June 3rd, 2010 @ 8:05am CDT
Posted by RiddlerJ on June 3rd, 2010 @ 8:05am CDT
"While she has a wealth of modelling experience including some past work with Michael Bay this will be her first acting role."
BWAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
BWAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Re: Rosie Huntington-Whiteley Confirmed for TF3 (1081635)
Posted by Diem on June 3rd, 2010 @ 8:15am CDT
Well if the rumours that she showed up for her audition in see-through lingerie are true, she's probably not in it for her acting.
Posted by Diem on June 3rd, 2010 @ 8:15am CDT
RiddlerJ wrote:"While she has a wealth of modelling experience including some past work with Michael Bay this will be her first acting role."
BWAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Well if the rumours that she showed up for her audition in see-through lingerie are true, she's probably not in it for her acting.
Re: Rosie Huntington-Whiteley Confirmed for TF3 (1081644)
Posted by yellow Camaro on June 3rd, 2010 @ 8:38am CDT
I believe Megan was not so bad in the first movie.
And in my opinion in the second movie the very bad thing was the script.
It is stupid to not confirm her just because she is quite thin and not tanned in this period.
She is in any case a nice girl and, above all, she is Mikaela Banes.
If they want to put a relevant female character in the third movie they would respect movie continuity and go on with Mikaela/Megan!
I hope Rosie Huntington-Whiteley will not play Mikaela Banes.
In that case, I'll forgive Bay and Habro/Paramount only if they will give us a huge Human Alliance Grindor toy with pretender Alice.
Posted by yellow Camaro on June 3rd, 2010 @ 8:38am CDT
I believe Megan was not so bad in the first movie. And in my opinion in the second movie the very bad thing was the script.
It is stupid to not confirm her just because she is quite thin and not tanned in this period.
She is in any case a nice girl and, above all, she is Mikaela Banes.
If they want to put a relevant female character in the third movie they would respect movie continuity and go on with Mikaela/Megan!
I hope Rosie Huntington-Whiteley will not play Mikaela Banes.
In that case, I'll forgive Bay and Habro/Paramount only if they will give us a huge Human Alliance Grindor toy with pretender Alice.
Re: Rosie Huntington-Whiteley Confirmed for TF3 (1081652)
Posted by BattleRoller23 on June 3rd, 2010 @ 8:58am CDT
Posted by BattleRoller23 on June 3rd, 2010 @ 8:58am CDT
Can we have just robots please?
Re: Rosie Huntington-Whiteley Confirmed for TF3 (1081653)
Posted by JeffX on June 3rd, 2010 @ 8:59am CDT
Posted by JeffX on June 3rd, 2010 @ 8:59am CDT
Well hopefully she's a good actress, but I'm not going to get my hopes high.
Re: Rosie Huntington-Whiteley Confirmed for TF3 (1081663)
Posted by Anonymous on June 3rd, 2010 @ 9:32am CDT
Only if she either has a natural acting ability or really good acting teachers.
Posted by Anonymous on June 3rd, 2010 @ 9:32am CDT
JeffX wrote:Well hopefully she's a good actress, but I'm not going to get my hopes high.
Only if she either has a natural acting ability or really good acting teachers.
Re: Rosie Huntington-Whiteley Confirmed for TF3 (1081669)
Posted by RiddlerJ on June 3rd, 2010 @ 9:42am CDT
Then she'll quit, complaining that Bay isn't treating her with any kind of respect.
Posted by RiddlerJ on June 3rd, 2010 @ 9:42am CDT
Diem wrote:Well if the rumours that she showed up for her audition in see-through lingerie are true, she's probably not in it for her acting.
Then she'll quit, complaining that Bay isn't treating her with any kind of respect.
Re: Rosie Huntington-Whiteley Confirmed for TF3 (1081674)
Posted by JRFitzpatrick7 on June 3rd, 2010 @ 10:05am CDT
Posted by JRFitzpatrick7 on June 3rd, 2010 @ 10:05am CDT
I'm torn, in some ways, I want her to be Mikaela but in some ways I want her to be Carly. I want her to be carly but I know they don't have time in the script to explain it well:/ maybe they will have a page in the prequel comics:/
Re: Rosie Huntington-Whiteley Confirmed for TF3 (1081680)
Posted by Lackadaisical on June 3rd, 2010 @ 10:24am CDT
I agree w. U. I'm going to the films exclusevily for the robots... I also would say more transformation scenes... they were so few in the second movie, and more robot dialogue, I mean, the movie is called Transformers, not a sort of people who have met them.
Posted by Lackadaisical on June 3rd, 2010 @ 10:24am CDT
BattleRoller23 wrote:Can we have just robots please?
I agree w. U. I'm going to the films exclusevily for the robots... I also would say more transformation scenes... they were so few in the second movie, and more robot dialogue, I mean, the movie is called Transformers, not a sort of people who have met them.
Re: Rosie Huntington-Whiteley Confirmed for TF3 (1081690)
Posted by DMSL on June 3rd, 2010 @ 10:53am CDT
Posted by DMSL on June 3rd, 2010 @ 10:53am CDT
She looks meh, definately prefer Megan Fox over her.
If they really want to get rid of Megan than i hope this girl is playing someone different. I really dislike changing actors and keeping the chars the same, doesn't work well for me.
If they really want to get rid of Megan than i hope this girl is playing someone different. I really dislike changing actors and keeping the chars the same, doesn't work well for me.
Re: Rosie Huntington-Whiteley Confirmed for TF3 (1081706)
Posted by Requiem Prime on June 3rd, 2010 @ 11:28am CDT
Posted by Requiem Prime on June 3rd, 2010 @ 11:28am CDT
Whatever; sexy must distract the masses what a horrible waste of time the series is.
Re: Rosie Huntington-Whiteley Confirmed for TF3 (1081712)
Posted by JRFitzpatrick7 on June 3rd, 2010 @ 11:40am CDT
I'm team Cheadle. Howard meh.
Posted by JRFitzpatrick7 on June 3rd, 2010 @ 11:40am CDT
DMSL wrote:She looks meh, definately prefer Megan Fox over her.
If they really want to get rid of Megan than i hope this girl is playing someone different. I really dislike changing actors and keeping the chars the same, doesn't work well for me.
I'm team Cheadle. Howard meh.
Re: Rosie Huntington-Whiteley Confirmed for TF3 (1081779)
Posted by AutobotTrainer on June 3rd, 2010 @ 2:31pm CDT
Posted by AutobotTrainer on June 3rd, 2010 @ 2:31pm CDT
Ridonkulous. I want to slap Michael Bay. 
Re: Rosie Huntington-Whiteley Confirmed for TF3 (1081848)
Posted by D-340 on June 3rd, 2010 @ 5:07pm CDT
You're askin' for way too much.
Posted by D-340 on June 3rd, 2010 @ 5:07pm CDT
BattleRoller23 wrote:Can we have just robots please?
You're askin' for way too much.
Re: Rosie Huntington-Whiteley Confirmed for TF3 (1081851)
Posted by Torneira on June 3rd, 2010 @ 5:14pm CDT
Posted by Torneira on June 3rd, 2010 @ 5:14pm CDT
I guess when I was watching Transformers G1 on the Fun Factory, Micheal Bay was watching too much of GI Joe or something, maby a bit confused with Mask? 
Re: Rosie Huntington-Whiteley Confirmed for TF3 (1081859)
Posted by SlyTF1 on June 3rd, 2010 @ 5:38pm CDT
Posted by SlyTF1 on June 3rd, 2010 @ 5:38pm CDT
I just hope she can act better than...that other person that I will no longer be meantioning. If I could have my way I'd have only 4 humans in the whole movie, and they'd be Sam, Lennox, Eps, and Galloway just so the Autobots can blow his head off. And maybe Sam's parents.
You know what would be awesome!? If Mojo was a pretender dog, sent to kill Sam because The Fallen already knew about him!
You know what would be awesome!? If Mojo was a pretender dog, sent to kill Sam because The Fallen already knew about him!
Re: Rosie Huntington-Whiteley Confirmed for TF3 (1081866)
Posted by Jacob P. Galvatron on June 3rd, 2010 @ 5:46pm CDT
Posted by Jacob P. Galvatron on June 3rd, 2010 @ 5:46pm CDT
Bluh...
Also, I think it's funny how everyone kind of assumes she'll be Mikaela or Carly.
They could just invent someone new.
Also, I think it's funny how everyone kind of assumes she'll be Mikaela or Carly.
They could just invent someone new.
Re: Rosie Huntington-Whiteley Confirmed for TF3 (1081871)
Posted by SlyTF1 on June 3rd, 2010 @ 5:57pm CDT
Or she could just make a cameo...I hope.
Posted by SlyTF1 on June 3rd, 2010 @ 5:57pm CDT
Jacob P. Galvatron wrote:Bluh...
Also, I think it's funny how everyone kind of assumes she'll be Mikaela or Carly.
They could just invent someone new.
Or she could just make a cameo...I hope.
Re: Rosie Huntington-Whiteley Confirmed for TF3 (1081886)
Posted by Blurrz on June 3rd, 2010 @ 6:14pm CDT
Yeah... Fox leaves and Huntington joins the cast... just a cameo..
Posted by Blurrz on June 3rd, 2010 @ 6:14pm CDT
SlyTF1 wrote:Jacob P. Galvatron wrote:Bluh...
Also, I think it's funny how everyone kind of assumes she'll be Mikaela or Carly.
They could just invent someone new.
Or she could just make a cameo...I hope.
Yeah... Fox leaves and Huntington joins the cast... just a cameo..
Re: Rosie Huntington-Whiteley Confirmed for TF3 (1081893)
Posted by Burn on June 3rd, 2010 @ 6:21pm CDT
My vote is for "Random Squashed Human Female"
Posted by Burn on June 3rd, 2010 @ 6:21pm CDT
Jacob P. Galvatron wrote:They could just invent someone new.
My vote is for "Random Squashed Human Female"
Re: Rosie Huntington-Whiteley Confirmed for TF3 (1081957)
Posted by Wolfguard on June 3rd, 2010 @ 9:41pm CDT
Posted by Wolfguard on June 3rd, 2010 @ 9:41pm CDT
Wow, great job on picking a very unattractive model with zero acting experience to boot. Seriously, if Bay was lookin' for eye candy, IMO he has achieved a truly epic FAIL in this regard.
Re: Rosie Huntington-Whiteley Confirmed for TF3 (1082030)
Posted by Albershide on June 4th, 2010 @ 2:11am CDT
Unfortunately it is written that she is a female LEAD. You don't get a cameo from a leading actor.
I also don't like the choice but let's give her a chance maybe she will fit in the story and maybe Bay knows how to shoot her to look good.
Posted by Albershide on June 4th, 2010 @ 2:11am CDT
SlyTF1 wrote:Jacob P. Galvatron wrote:Bluh...
Also, I think it's funny how everyone kind of assumes she'll be Mikaela or Carly.
They could just invent someone new.
Or she could just make a cameo...I hope.
Unfortunately it is written that she is a female LEAD. You don't get a cameo from a leading actor.
I also don't like the choice but let's give her a chance maybe she will fit in the story and maybe Bay knows how to shoot her to look good.
Re: Rosie Huntington-Whiteley Confirmed for TF3 (1082140)
Posted by RiddlerJ on June 4th, 2010 @ 8:52am CDT
Posted by RiddlerJ on June 4th, 2010 @ 8:52am CDT
This is so stupid.
At one time, it made sense to put an actor or actress in a film if they were just eye candy since every little bit helps sell the movie.
But nowadays there's no point in paying twenty bucks to go to a movie just to gawk at an actress when she's wearing less on magazines and online. Espcially when you want to stab your eyes out every time she tries to actually "act".
I don't get why actors like this get priority over something I would pay to see a movie for (hint: big robots fighting, maybe a story about them and not their teenage human buddies).
At one time, it made sense to put an actor or actress in a film if they were just eye candy since every little bit helps sell the movie.
But nowadays there's no point in paying twenty bucks to go to a movie just to gawk at an actress when she's wearing less on magazines and online. Espcially when you want to stab your eyes out every time she tries to actually "act".
I don't get why actors like this get priority over something I would pay to see a movie for (hint: big robots fighting, maybe a story about them and not their teenage human buddies).
Re: Rosie Huntington-Whiteley Confirmed for TF3 (1082174)
Posted by SEXFIGHTER on June 4th, 2010 @ 10:26am CDT
Posted by SEXFIGHTER on June 4th, 2010 @ 10:26am CDT
she looks just like Fox so i reckon it's gonna be the same crappy role her predecessor had. Enough about chicks already... R.O.B.O.T.S PLEASSSSSSEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
Re: Rosie Huntington-Whiteley Confirmed for TF3 (1082244)
Posted by Ravenous Nightwind on June 4th, 2010 @ 1:55pm CDT
Posted by Ravenous Nightwind on June 4th, 2010 @ 1:55pm CDT
Yeah I agree. I mean why find someone identical as megan anyway? Just give him a new girlfriend and make it like they didn't hit it off or something and just get to telling the story about the transformers. I mean..I don't think human characters are as important really considering its really all about the robots.SEXFIGHTER wrote:she looks just like Fox so i reckon it's gonna be the same crappy role her predecessor had. Enough about chicks already... R.O.B.O.T.S PLEASSSSSSEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
Re: Rosie Huntington-Whiteley Confirmed for TF3 (1082263)
Posted by SlyTF1 on June 4th, 2010 @ 2:28pm CDT
If only...
Posted by SlyTF1 on June 4th, 2010 @ 2:28pm CDT
Burn wrote:Jacob P. Galvatron wrote:They could just invent someone new.
My vote is for "Random Squashed Human Female"
If only...
Re: Rosie Huntington-Whiteley Confirmed for TF3 (1082264)
Posted by SlyTF1 on June 4th, 2010 @ 2:33pm CDT
No! Dont give Sam a girlfriend! Kill off Makayla in the first 10 minutes and have nothing but giant robot fights afterwards! If you want a damn love story, there are 3 ROBOT couples waiting for that role! Optimus and Ileta 1, Ironhida and Chromia, Arcee and some other random Autobot (perferably Sideswipe) just leave the human love story out of it and give us what we payed for! A f*king 3 hour movie with nothing but big ass cool looking robots making even bigger ass cooler looking explosions! Who's with me!?
Posted by SlyTF1 on June 4th, 2010 @ 2:33pm CDT
Ravenous Nightwind wrote:Yeah I agree. I mean why find someone identical as megan anyway? Just give him a new girlfriend and make it like they didn't hit it off or something and just get to telling the story about the transformers. I mean..I don't think human characters are as important really considering its really all about the robots.SEXFIGHTER wrote:she looks just like Fox so i reckon it's gonna be the same crappy role her predecessor had. Enough about chicks already... R.O.B.O.T.S PLEASSSSSSEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
No! Dont give Sam a girlfriend! Kill off Makayla in the first 10 minutes and have nothing but giant robot fights afterwards! If you want a damn love story, there are 3 ROBOT couples waiting for that role! Optimus and Ileta 1, Ironhida and Chromia, Arcee and some other random Autobot (perferably Sideswipe) just leave the human love story out of it and give us what we payed for! A f*king 3 hour movie with nothing but big ass cool looking robots making even bigger ass cooler looking explosions! Who's with me!?
Re: Rosie Huntington-Whiteley Confirmed for TF3 (1082288)
Posted by 5150 Cruiser on June 4th, 2010 @ 3:45pm CDT
No. We can't. Nearly every generation of TF has involved humans in some shape or form, so it isn't going to stop now. Would we all like to have nothing but ronbots fighting, and talking for 2.5 hours... Sure. But thats not a reality. The quicker everyone just accepts this, the sooner we can all enjoy the franchise for what it is.
Like i said above, humans have always had some kind of role in TF. I think the only en of TF that didn't envole any humans was Beast Wars. Humans have, and always will have thier place in the TF universe. This is fact people. Part of the TF story line is how they interact with humans. Remember, their on earth. Not Cybertron.
I ussualy agree with you on most things, but i don't think i'm going to see eye, to eye with you on this. a robot love story would be an epic fail as it has "cheeze" writen all over it. It would also give critics and the media fuel to the fire to bash this movie even harder the ROTF.
Another key note that many seem to forget,....
These movies were not made soley for us. Their catered to the general public with a little lean towards the fandom. Love stories, human characters, all this is needed to get the general public involved. Thats how the franchise makes money. Heck, we wouldn't even be having a discussion right now if it weren't for the success of the first two movies.
Posted by 5150 Cruiser on June 4th, 2010 @ 3:45pm CDT
BattleRoller23 wrote:Can we have just robots please?
No. We can't. Nearly every generation of TF has involved humans in some shape or form, so it isn't going to stop now. Would we all like to have nothing but ronbots fighting, and talking for 2.5 hours... Sure. But thats not a reality. The quicker everyone just accepts this, the sooner we can all enjoy the franchise for what it is.
[ quote="Ravenous Nightwind"]Yeah I agree. I mean why find someone identical as megan anyway? Just give him a new girlfriend and make it like they didn't hit it off or something and just get to telling the story about the transformers. I mean..I don't think human characters are as important really considering its really all about the robots.[/quote]SEXFIGHTER wrote:she looks just like Fox so i reckon it's gonna be the same crappy role her predecessor had. Enough about chicks already... R.O.B.O.T.S PLEASSSSSSEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
Like i said above, humans have always had some kind of role in TF. I think the only en of TF that didn't envole any humans was Beast Wars. Humans have, and always will have thier place in the TF universe. This is fact people. Part of the TF story line is how they interact with humans. Remember, their on earth. Not Cybertron.
SlyTF1 wrote:No! Dont give Sam a girlfriend! Kill off Makayla in the first 10 minutes and have nothing but giant robot fights afterwards! If you want a damn love story, there are 3 ROBOT couples waiting for that role! Optimus and Ileta 1, Ironhida and Chromia, Arcee and some other random Autobot (perferably Sideswipe) just leave the human love story out of it and give us what we payed for! A f*king 3 hour movie with nothing but big ass cool looking robots making even bigger ass cooler looking explosions! Who's with me!?
I ussualy agree with you on most things, but i don't think i'm going to see eye, to eye with you on this. a robot love story would be an epic fail as it has "cheeze" writen all over it. It would also give critics and the media fuel to the fire to bash this movie even harder the ROTF.
Another key note that many seem to forget,....
These movies were not made soley for us. Their catered to the general public with a little lean towards the fandom. Love stories, human characters, all this is needed to get the general public involved. Thats how the franchise makes money. Heck, we wouldn't even be having a discussion right now if it weren't for the success of the first two movies.
Re: Rosie Huntington-Whiteley Confirmed for TF3 (1082296)
Posted by 5150 Cruiser on June 4th, 2010 @ 3:53pm CDT
Posted by 5150 Cruiser on June 4th, 2010 @ 3:53pm CDT
You know, there's another good way to look at this.
Since this is her first major acting role, she's probbly only getting paid a quarter of what fox would have gotten had she been the leading lady. So the extra funds could go to more robot scenes. Just a thought...
Since this is her first major acting role, she's probbly only getting paid a quarter of what fox would have gotten had she been the leading lady. So the extra funds could go to more robot scenes. Just a thought...
Re: Rosie Huntington-Whiteley Confirmed for TF3 (1082407)
Posted by Elita One on June 4th, 2010 @ 11:37pm CDT
We can guess how she got the 'job'
.
Posted by Elita One on June 4th, 2010 @ 11:37pm CDT
Well if the rumours that she showed up for her audition in see-through lingerie are true, she's probably not in it for her acting.
We can guess how she got the 'job'
.
Re: Rosie Huntington-Whiteley Confirmed for TF3 (1082559)
Posted by Autobot Strider on June 5th, 2010 @ 2:39pm CDT
Posted by Autobot Strider on June 5th, 2010 @ 2:39pm CDT
The part that frustrates me about this depends greatly on how this new female lead is incorporated.
1) She replaces Fox as Mikaela. No real irritation on my part.
2) Mikaela is 'written out' and "Carly" (or whoever) is played by Rosie. Here's the irritation. They've spent two movies building up the 'love connection' between Sam and Mikaela. So now if they dump that character, not only do we have to devote valuable screen time to their breakup, we also have to sit through a new 'love connection'. All of this equals LESS GIANT ROBOTS. Plus, it cheapens the relationship building that Sam and Mikaela have gone through in the past two films. Didn't she say "who else could be your girlfriend?" They have been through some serious crap together and it would be dumb to have to scrap that and start over with a new character just because Megan Fox is an idiot.
Anyway, that's my two cents.
1) She replaces Fox as Mikaela. No real irritation on my part.
2) Mikaela is 'written out' and "Carly" (or whoever) is played by Rosie. Here's the irritation. They've spent two movies building up the 'love connection' between Sam and Mikaela. So now if they dump that character, not only do we have to devote valuable screen time to their breakup, we also have to sit through a new 'love connection'. All of this equals LESS GIANT ROBOTS. Plus, it cheapens the relationship building that Sam and Mikaela have gone through in the past two films. Didn't she say "who else could be your girlfriend?" They have been through some serious crap together and it would be dumb to have to scrap that and start over with a new character just because Megan Fox is an idiot.
Anyway, that's my two cents.
Re: Rosie Huntington-Whiteley Confirmed for TF3 (1082579)
Posted by Evil_the_Nub on June 5th, 2010 @ 3:49pm CDT
As much as I hate when characters get recast in sequels, I think it's the better option here. After everything they've been through together it would be really weird is Sam suddenly had another girlfriend out of nowhere.
Posted by Evil_the_Nub on June 5th, 2010 @ 3:49pm CDT
Autobot Strider wrote:The part that frustrates me about this depends greatly on how this new female lead is incorporated.
1) She replaces Fox as Mikaela. No real irritation on my part.
2) Mikaela is 'written out' and "Carly" (or whoever) is played by Rosie. Here's the irritation. They've spent two movies building up the 'love connection' between Sam and Mikaela. So now if they dump that character, not only do we have to devote valuable screen time to their breakup, we also have to sit through a new 'love connection'. All of this equals LESS GIANT ROBOTS. Plus, it cheapens the relationship building that Sam and Mikaela have gone through in the past two films. Didn't she say "who else could be your girlfriend?" They have been through some serious crap together and it would be dumb to have to scrap that and start over with a new character just because Megan Fox is an idiot.
Anyway, that's my two cents.
As much as I hate when characters get recast in sequels, I think it's the better option here. After everything they've been through together it would be really weird is Sam suddenly had another girlfriend out of nowhere.
Re: Rosie Huntington-Whiteley Confirmed for TF3 (1082672)
Posted by Joshua Vallse on June 5th, 2010 @ 10:56pm CDT
Hum,
1. Her profound knowledge of the Transformers mythos and study into the characters?
2. Her profound ability to bring a high class atmosphere in her acting to any given scene?
3. Her profound love for hard candy?
Tough choices. I say we just make all of them pretenders and square off this mystery of why hot school girls and Victoria secret models continue to flock to Shia "Eyebrows" LeBouf.
Just sayin, now I'm in the mood for some hard candy...weird
Posted by Joshua Vallse on June 5th, 2010 @ 10:56pm CDT
Elita One wrote:We can guess how she got the 'job'
Hum,
1. Her profound knowledge of the Transformers mythos and study into the characters?
2. Her profound ability to bring a high class atmosphere in her acting to any given scene?
3. Her profound love for hard candy?
Tough choices. I say we just make all of them pretenders and square off this mystery of why hot school girls and Victoria secret models continue to flock to Shia "Eyebrows" LeBouf.
Just sayin, now I'm in the mood for some hard candy...weird
Re: Rosie Huntington-Whiteley Confirmed for TF3 (1082708)
Posted by Just Negare on June 6th, 2010 @ 5:19am CDT
Posted by Just Negare on June 6th, 2010 @ 5:19am CDT
Slap a cowboy hat on her and give her a bucket of soapy water and I'd say you have yourselves a Charlene.
Or hey, why not appeal to the young women intellectuals out there, throw on a pair of broad frammed spectacles and we can call her Dr. Harding.
Bay's been known to dig up all sorts of TF mythos, why stop with just a Carly or a Mikahea v 2.
My love of giant robots and explosions will over ride any common sense I have in saving my $15.50, of course, if it sucks royally I'll be all over the net complaining about it as soon I switch on my computer after it screens.
I really hope ROTF was sh1t on purpose so we all are pleasantly delighted with the 3rd one.
Or hey, why not appeal to the young women intellectuals out there, throw on a pair of broad frammed spectacles and we can call her Dr. Harding.
Bay's been known to dig up all sorts of TF mythos, why stop with just a Carly or a Mikahea v 2.
My love of giant robots and explosions will over ride any common sense I have in saving my $15.50, of course, if it sucks royally I'll be all over the net complaining about it as soon I switch on my computer after it screens.
I really hope ROTF was sh1t on purpose so we all are pleasantly delighted with the 3rd one.
Re: Rosie Huntington-Whiteley Confirmed for TF3 (1088422)
Posted by soundwave1994 on June 20th, 2010 @ 2:29pm CDT
Posted by soundwave1994 on June 20th, 2010 @ 2:29pm CDT
you guys wont belive this but i am from plymouth which is where she is from an i have actually met her a few times
