Takara Tomy Transformers Masterpiece MP-32 Optimus Primal On Display
Saturday, May 7th, 2016 1:07PM CDT
Categories: Toy News, Event NewsPosted by: Va'al Views: 43,602
Topic Options: View Discussion · Sign in or Join to reply
News Search
Got Transformers News? Let us know here!
Most Popular Transformers News
Most Recent Transformers News
Posted by shajaki on May 7th, 2016 @ 1:31pm CDT
Posted by Va'al on May 7th, 2016 @ 1:33pm CDT
shajaki wrote:What on earth is that non-transforming gorilla doing there?
Reference model?
Posted by william-james88 on May 7th, 2016 @ 1:38pm CDT
Dr Va'al wrote:shajaki wrote:What on earth is that non-transforming gorilla doing there?
Reference model?
It seems to be an unpainted version of what was shown one year ago:
Posted by shajaki on May 7th, 2016 @ 2:18pm CDT
Immediately what my mind jumped to, but I thought (nay, hoped even) that it was a new accessory. But an entire figure as an additional accessory is quite an additionwilliam-james88 wrote:It seems to be an unpainted version of what was shown one year ago:Dr Va'al wrote:Reference model?shajaki wrote:What on earth is that non-transforming gorilla doing there?
Posted by Optimum Supreme on May 7th, 2016 @ 5:21pm CDT
shajaki wrote:What on earth is that non-transforming gorilla doing there?
Reminds me of this big plastic King Kong piggybank I had as a kid. And looks almost as articulated.
Posted by President-prime on May 8th, 2016 @ 3:47pm CDT
Posted by shajaki on May 8th, 2016 @ 6:27pm CDT
So... because he can't store the extra faces, he's not the definitive version?President-prime wrote:Aren't these figures supposed to be called "masterpiece"? Why are we're getting faces of robots and gorilla apart from the toy itself. Couldn't they just incorporporate those faces into the actual toy. I hate "losing faces!" They could just do something like the Generation and animated Blitzwing, or Masters of the universe man e faces. And don't tell me it's cost. It's not like the toys are $30. It's a masterpiece! It's supposed to be the definitive version of that character.
Posted by galvatron00 on May 8th, 2016 @ 6:34pm CDT
Posted by Insurgent on May 8th, 2016 @ 6:47pm CDT
Posted by President-prime on May 8th, 2016 @ 8:57pm CDT
Posted by william-james88 on May 8th, 2016 @ 10:05pm CDT
President-prime wrote:Aren't these figures supposed to be called "masterpiece"? Why are we're getting faces of robots and gorilla apart from the toy itself. Couldn't they just incorporporate those faces into the actual toy. I hate "losing faces!" They could just do something like the Generation and animated Blitzwing, or Masters of the universe man e faces. And don't tell me it's cost. It's not like the toys are $30. It's a masterpiece! It's supposed to be the definitive version of that character.
I think that because they are marketting these to adults, they probably think that these will be treated with care and trust us not to lose them like what we used to do with small parts when we were kids.
Posted by Sowndwave76 on May 8th, 2016 @ 10:14pm CDT
And yet, I still have zero desire to have it in my collection.
Posted by President-prime on May 8th, 2016 @ 10:15pm CDT
Posted by william-james88 on May 8th, 2016 @ 10:21pm CDT
President-prime wrote:Thank you for response and non offensive comment. Like people not liking backpacks or bits and pieces of car parts visible on the robot, I prefer my figures fully in tact. Personally, I feel that figures where we need to switch parts or extra this and that other than weapons and additional accessories are not definitive. figures are creeping up to the hundreds now. How hard is it to create a face where it could be flipped out. But that's just me. You guys can disagree.
Of course, I understand, but I dont think Takara is thinking the same way you are with this line and what the title means. This looks a lot like they are trying to imitate the Hot Toys or Mesco which are about being the most definitive version of a character. And part of that means that they are customisable to imitate every situation you may want to pose them in on a shelf. So these are more like extras catering to hardcore fans rather than pieces they find integral to the actual toy.
I really think this is just a difference in understanding of the point of the line. You arent the only one, many fans find their strictness to the cartoon to be the line's current flaw.
Here is an idea of what they are imitating in their approach to this line:
Posted by D-Maximal_Primal on May 8th, 2016 @ 10:30pm CDT
Posted by fenrir72 on May 8th, 2016 @ 10:51pm CDT
President-prime wrote:Thank you for response and non offensive comment. Like people not liking backpacks or bits and pieces of car parts visible on the robot, I prefer my figures fully in tact. Personally, I feel that figures where we need to switch parts or extra this and that other than weapons and additional accessories are not definitive. figures are creeping up to the hundreds now. How hard is it to create a face where it could be flipped out. But that's just me. You guys can disagree.
Parts switching seems to be more economical. Extra mechanisms on such a small figure might break the bank for a certain project to be green lit. Been done for sometime even for higher end figures like SoC, figma etc.
Oh and don't be afraid to break the mold with your posts. We all have our own preferences.
Posted by Ironhidensh on May 9th, 2016 @ 5:25am CDT
fenrir72 wrote:President-prime wrote:Thank you for response and non offensive comment. Like people not liking backpacks or bits and pieces of car parts visible on the robot, I prefer my figures fully in tact. Personally, I feel that figures where we need to switch parts or extra this and that other than weapons and additional accessories are not definitive. figures are creeping up to the hundreds now. How hard is it to create a face where it could be flipped out. But that's just me. You guys can disagree.
Parts switching seems to be more economical. Extra mechanisms on such a small figure might break the bank for a certain project to be green lit. Been done for sometime even for higher end figures like SoC, figma etc.
Oh and don't be afraid to break the mold with your posts. We all have our own preferences.
Even high end Macross toys come with some degree (usually just hands) of parts switching. I guess it's just something I've come to expect.
Posted by fenrir72 on May 9th, 2016 @ 6:54am CDT
Ironhidensh wrote:fenrir72 wrote:President-prime wrote:Thank you for response and non offensive comment. Like people not liking backpacks or bits and pieces of car parts visible on the robot, I prefer my figures fully in tact. Personally, I feel that figures where we need to switch parts or extra this and that other than weapons and additional accessories are not definitive. figures are creeping up to the hundreds now. How hard is it to create a face where it could be flipped out. But that's just me. You guys can disagree.
Parts switching seems to be more economical. Extra mechanisms on such a small figure might break the bank for a certain project to be green lit. Been done for sometime even for higher end figures like SoC, figma etc.
Oh and don't be afraid to break the mold with your posts. We all have our own preferences.
Even high end Macross toys come with some degree (usually just hands) of parts switching. I guess it's just something I've come to expect.
And to get around mass shifting/proportionality issues. Slight deviation. If you recall the Bandai Godaikins of the 80s. Not proportional. Some heads like Toshio Daimos had big heads and wee bodies for the Tranzer. The SoC version version dealt with the issue by having a proportional head swap.
As Ironhidensh mentioned, Yamato and some Bandai Macross figs switched hands with the puffed marshmallow type to the mechanical gear detail type. So like MP-UM, awesome as it is would have looked nice if he had poseable fingers to hold the Matrix.
But nothing wrong in wanting the whole package without switching parts.
Still, for a non BW TFfan, I bit the bullet and ordered him. Too bad it won't be one with the extra weapon like the one for the Asia market
Posted by Va'al on June 9th, 2016 @ 6:12am CDT
Posted by Big Grim on June 9th, 2016 @ 8:02am CDT
Posted by D-Maximal_Primal on June 9th, 2016 @ 8:04am CDT
Posted by Insurgent on June 9th, 2016 @ 8:49am CDT
Posted by Samsonator on June 9th, 2016 @ 12:35pm CDT
Posted by DecepticonFinishline on June 9th, 2016 @ 12:35pm CDT
.... But seriously.... Bat-mask...
Posted by Ironhidensh on June 9th, 2016 @ 12:47pm CDT
Posted by william-james88 on June 9th, 2016 @ 12:59pm CDT
Ironhidensh wrote:The awesome is so strong with this guy that it makes up for the complete fail that is Titans Return.
Come on man, Wheelie is pretty cool.
Posted by Ironhidensh on June 9th, 2016 @ 1:12pm CDT
william-james88 wrote:Ironhidensh wrote:The awesome is so strong with this guy that it makes up for the complete fail that is Titans Return.
Come on man, Wheelie is pretty cool.
True. One figure, however, cannot save an entire line.
Posted by william-james88 on June 9th, 2016 @ 1:17pm CDT
Ironhidensh wrote:william-james88 wrote:Ironhidensh wrote:The awesome is so strong with this guy that it makes up for the complete fail that is Titans Return.
Come on man, Wheelie is pretty cool.
True. One figure, however, cannot save an entire line.
I personally feel that line is ultra solid and I feel lucky as a TF fan that if I have a problem with how any of them look paint wise, I have another option. But of course, I totally respect anyone who thinks otherwise.
Posted by Ironhidensh on June 9th, 2016 @ 1:26pm CDT
william-james88 wrote:Ironhidensh wrote:william-james88 wrote:Ironhidensh wrote:The awesome is so strong with this guy that it makes up for the complete fail that is Titans Return.
Come on man, Wheelie is pretty cool.
True. One figure, however, cannot save an entire line.
I personally feel that line is ultra solid and I feel lucky as a TF fan that if I have a problem with how any of them look paint wise, I have another option. But of course, I totally respect anyone who thinks otherwise.
I know I'm in the vast minority with my feelings. Ironically, I actually like the paint on many of the line's figures. My problems lie with non headmasters now being headmasters. Bad mold choices for repaints on characters who deserve original molds. Also, in my opinion, bad size class choices. It would also be fair to say I've been so spoiled by masterpiece and 3rd party, I have a hard time giving the main lines a fair look.
Thankfully, there are figures like Primal here to make up for the rest.
Posted by william-james88 on June 9th, 2016 @ 1:41pm CDT
Ironhidensh wrote:I know I'm in the vast minority with my feelings. Ironically, I actually like the paint on many of the line's figures. My problems lie with non headmasters now being headmasters. Bad mold choices for repaints on characters who deserve original molds. Also, in my opinion, bad size class choices. It would also be fair to say I've been so spoiled by masterpiece and 3rd party, I have a hard time giving the main lines a fair look.
Thankfully, there are figures like Primal here to make up for the rest.
I totally get that size class issue. As for the headmasters on everyone thing I recently learned that the movie bots all became headmasters in the Japanese cartoon, so its not completely as left field as I thought at first. And Takara's looks sooooooooo good. As good as this Primal (I preordered both from Anime export). And believe it or not, I am a bit more appreciative of these mainline products over the MPs and 3p toys. I own them too and somehow because of the money I spend, I expect more than I usually get (in recent memory, only Ironhide really lived up to my expectations). With cheaper mainline toys, I expect less and usually dont end up dissapointed. Also, so far all my 3p toys had issues with really loose parts or pieces falling off so it leaves a bitter taste.
Posted by Va'al on July 29th, 2016 @ 5:24am CDT
Posted by Big Grim on July 29th, 2016 @ 7:08am CDT
Posted by william-james88 on July 29th, 2016 @ 8:36am CDT
Big Grim wrote:Dammit, the more I see of these, the more I want em. But my MP shelves are pretty full as it is!
no worries, start a new shelf just for Beast Wars MPs, doesnt have to be next to the others
Posted by Big Grim on July 29th, 2016 @ 10:04am CDT
Posted by william-james88 on August 2nd, 2016 @ 8:51am CDT
Posted by Noideaforaname on August 2nd, 2016 @ 9:35am CDT
Obligatory quote:
Posted by dragons on August 2nd, 2016 @ 11:08am CDT
Posted by Sabrblade on August 2nd, 2016 @ 11:26am CDT
He didn't use one in the series. The weapon is from his original 1996 Ultra class toy.dragons wrote:Nice I don't ever remember him using one in series
Posted by D-Maximal_Primal on August 4th, 2016 @ 10:20am CDT
Posted by Va'al on September 10th, 2016 @ 2:52am CDT
Posted by Va'al on October 12th, 2016 @ 2:53am CDT
Posted by Autobot Roadburn on October 12th, 2016 @ 3:55am CDT
Posted by BeastProwl on October 12th, 2016 @ 5:25am CDT
Posted by fenrir72 on October 12th, 2016 @ 6:43am CDT
Posted by Burn on October 12th, 2016 @ 7:03am CDT
Posted by Big Grim on October 12th, 2016 @ 7:17am CDT
Posted by william-james88 on October 12th, 2016 @ 7:52am CDT
Burn wrote:meh...I'm content with the original BW version. That was a damn good figure.
How's the arm poseability?
Posted by Sabrblade on October 12th, 2016 @ 8:04am CDT
It doesn't look like 総 ("Sō") to me, which is the Kanji in 総司令官 ("Sōshireikan") that means "Supreme Commander", the rank commonly attributed to Autobot and Maximal leaders in Japan.
Posted by Ravage XK on October 12th, 2016 @ 8:24am CDT
Posted by fenrir72 on October 12th, 2016 @ 8:25am CDT
Sabrblade wrote:The boxed pic is so tiny I can't make out that first Kanji in his rank. I can tell the rest of it is 司令官 ("Shireikan"), meaning "Commander", but that first Kanji is too small for me to read.
It doesn't look like 総 ("Sō") to me, which is the Kanji in 総司令官 ("Sōshireikan") that means "Supreme Commander", the rank commonly attributed to Autobot and Maximal leaders in Japan.
Wasn't Fortress and Starsaber one of those?