Transformers: Robots In Disguise New Decepticon Character Scuzzard Revealed
Thursday, April 2nd, 2015 3:38PM CDT
Categories: Cartoon News, Book NewsPosted by: Va'al Views: 62,987
Topic Options: View Discussion · Sign in or Join to reply
This page may contain affiliate links. We may earn commissions when readers interact with or purchase items through these links. For more information, see our affiliate disclosures here.
Thanks to an Amazon listing for a new chapter book based on the Transformers: Robots in Disguise animated series, we have the reveal of a new member of the escaped Decepticons: Scuzzard! You can check out the listing for the book, authored by John Sazaklis and out in May, here, and check out the cover showing off Bumblebee and the new Con below!
The first in an exciting, original chapter book series based on the new Cartoon Network show, Transformers: Robots in Disguise!
Copyright © 2015 Hasbro.
Credit(s): Amazon.com
News Search
Got Transformers News? Let us know here!
Most Popular Transformers News
Most Recent Transformers News
News Categories: Toy News, Movie Related News, Cartoon News, Comic Book News, Site News, Rumors, Event News, Digital Media News, Collectables, Sponsor News, Game News, Site Articles, Store News, Reviews, People News, Company News, Sightings, Press Releases, Unlicensed Products News, Auctions, Transtopia, Interviews, Editorials, Collector's Club News, Knock Offs, Podcast, Heavy Metal War, Contests, Book News, Top Lists
Re: Transformers: Robots In Disguise New Decepticon Character Scuzzard Revealed (1670472)
Posted by Emerje on April 2nd, 2015 @ 4:02pm CDT
Posted by Emerje on April 2nd, 2015 @ 4:02pm CDT
Please tell me he turns into a missile launcher. Also kinda wish they spelled his name Skuzzard so we could spell Skar out of his name. It's the little things, you know?
Emerje
Emerje
Re: Transformers: Robots In Disguise New Decepticon Character Scuzzard Revealed (1670479)
Posted by NuclearConvoy on April 2nd, 2015 @ 4:22pm CDT
Posted by NuclearConvoy on April 2nd, 2015 @ 4:22pm CDT
Hope we get a toy. It looks like Filch except with a different head and neck. It would be an easy pretool mold.
Re: Transformers: Robots In Disguise New Decepticon Character Scuzzard Revealed (1670485)
Posted by psj333 on April 2nd, 2015 @ 4:29pm CDT
Posted by psj333 on April 2nd, 2015 @ 4:29pm CDT
Does the new Decepticon, Scuzzard, has a vehicle mode like most other Decepticon, or he is related to or just like Filch? 
Re: Transformers: Robots In Disguise New Decepticon Character Scuzzard Revealed (1670515)
Posted by Deadput on April 2nd, 2015 @ 5:45pm CDT
Posted by Deadput on April 2nd, 2015 @ 5:45pm CDT
Wonder how long until Hasbro gets into trouble with that name.
(Google it up and you'll know what I mean.)
(Google it up and you'll know what I mean.)
Re: Transformers: Robots In Disguise New Decepticon Character Scuzzard Revealed (1670517)
Posted by Deadput on April 2nd, 2015 @ 5:49pm CDT
They certainly care when it comes to the cartoons and not the games and books.
Plus they have already made reference to Griffin Rock in the show (regarding Bumblebee's alt mode)
Posted by Deadput on April 2nd, 2015 @ 5:49pm CDT
NuclearConvoy wrote:This would require the writers to care about the aligned continuity. I don't know yet if they do.
They certainly care when it comes to the cartoons and not the games and books.
Plus they have already made reference to Griffin Rock in the show (regarding Bumblebee's alt mode)
Re: Transformers: Robots In Disguise New Decepticon Character Scuzzard Revealed (1670519)
Posted by Cobotron on April 2nd, 2015 @ 5:55pm CDT
Oh that is just unfortunate. 
Posted by Cobotron on April 2nd, 2015 @ 5:55pm CDT
mirageandjazz1197 wrote:(Google it up and you'll know what I mean.)
Oh that is just unfortunate.
Re: Transformers: Robots In Disguise New Decepticon Character Scuzzard Revealed (1670541)
Posted by NuclearConvoy on April 2nd, 2015 @ 6:50pm CDT
It's Nexus Maximus all over again.
Posted by NuclearConvoy on April 2nd, 2015 @ 6:50pm CDT
Cobotron wrote:mirageandjazz1197 wrote:(Google it up and you'll know what I mean.)
It's Nexus Maximus all over again.
Re: Transformers: Robots In Disguise New Decepticon Character Scuzzard Revealed (1670546)
Posted by Burn on April 2nd, 2015 @ 7:08pm CDT
And just what are those claws about to do to poor old Bumblebee.
I think this may be worse than Nexus Maximus.
Posted by Burn on April 2nd, 2015 @ 7:08pm CDT
mirageandjazz1197 wrote:Wonder how long until Hasbro gets into trouble with that name.
(Google it up and you'll know what I mean.)
And just what are those claws about to do to poor old Bumblebee.
I think this may be worse than Nexus Maximus.
Re: Transformers: Robots In Disguise New Decepticon Character Scuzzard Revealed (1670635)
Posted by Ironhidensh on April 3rd, 2015 @ 5:23am CDT
Posted by Ironhidensh on April 3rd, 2015 @ 5:23am CDT
Well, I was thinking about givng this series a try, then I read through this thread a bit. Now I know not to waste my time, though I might dvr it for the boys. Thanks guys.
Re: Transformers: Robots In Disguise New Decepticon Character Scuzzard Revealed (1670651)
Posted by Sabrblade on April 3rd, 2015 @ 8:16am CDT
Posted by Sabrblade on April 3rd, 2015 @ 8:16am CDT
And just whose posts were you reading, exactly? Most of us who watched all of the first 13 episodes have given the show a Thumbs Up. The majority of the naysayers were those who only watched the first one or two episodes.Ironhidensh wrote:Well, I was thinking about givng this series a try, then I read through this thread a bit. Now I know not to waste my time, though I might dvr it for the boys. Thanks guys.
Re: Transformers: Robots In Disguise New Decepticon Character Scuzzard Revealed (1670754)
Posted by Ironhidensh on April 3rd, 2015 @ 12:12pm CDT
Yes, I know. The positive reviews are what turned me off. I'm selective in my tv tastes, and this show, while it may be good, is not something I'd enjoy. As said, I will start recording it for my boys.
Posted by Ironhidensh on April 3rd, 2015 @ 12:12pm CDT
Sabrblade wrote:And just whose posts were you reading, exactly? Most of us who watched all of the first 13 episodes have given the show a Thumbs Up. The majority of the naysayers were those who only watched the first one or two episodes.Ironhidensh wrote:Well, I was thinking about givng this series a try, then I read through this thread a bit. Now I know not to waste my time, though I might dvr it for the boys. Thanks guys.
Yes, I know. The positive reviews are what turned me off. I'm selective in my tv tastes, and this show, while it may be good, is not something I'd enjoy. As said, I will start recording it for my boys.
Re: Transformers: Robots In Disguise New Decepticon Character Scuzzard Revealed (1670796)
Posted by NuclearConvoy on April 3rd, 2015 @ 2:51pm CDT
I'm just curious about what turned you off the series based on positive reviews?
Posted by NuclearConvoy on April 3rd, 2015 @ 2:51pm CDT
Ironhidensh wrote:Sabrblade wrote:And just whose posts were you reading, exactly? Most of us who watched all of the first 13 episodes have given the show a Thumbs Up. The majority of the naysayers were those who only watched the first one or two episodes.Ironhidensh wrote:Well, I was thinking about givng this series a try, then I read through this thread a bit. Now I know not to waste my time, though I might dvr it for the boys. Thanks guys.
Yes, I know. The positive reviews are what turned me off. I'm selective in my tv tastes, and this show, while it may be good, is not something I'd enjoy. As said, I will start recording it for my boys.
I'm just curious about what turned you off the series based on positive reviews?
Re: Transformers: Robots In Disguise New Decepticon Character Scuzzard Revealed (1670817)
Posted by Ironhidensh on April 3rd, 2015 @ 3:56pm CDT
Posted by Ironhidensh on April 3rd, 2015 @ 3:56pm CDT
Just isn't my cup of tea, you know? I might finally be out growing kiddie shows. My free time is very limited and this show has nothing appealing to me to watch it over the many other shows I have to watch. I'll see if my boys like it, and maybe give it a chance then.
Re: Transformers: Robots In Disguise New Decepticon Character Scuzzard Revealed (1670909)
Posted by mooncake623 on April 3rd, 2015 @ 10:10pm CDT
Posted by mooncake623 on April 3rd, 2015 @ 10:10pm CDT
Hasbo's Official Transformers YouTube channel uploaded two new videos that introduces of the Decepticons Steeljaw and Underbite from the New Robots in Disguise animated series. Check out the videos we've embedded below for your viewing pleasures, and remember keep your optics tuned to Seibertron.com for the latest in news and updates!
Re: Transformers: Robots In Disguise New Decepticon Character Scuzzard Revealed (1670931)
Posted by Sabrblade on April 3rd, 2015 @ 11:04pm CDT
Posted by Sabrblade on April 3rd, 2015 @ 11:04pm CDT
That footage of Airazor and Divebomb riding on Steeljaw's altmode is from a post-episode 13 episode.
Re: Transformers: Robots In Disguise New Decepticon Character Scuzzard Revealed (1670986)
Posted by Lockdownhunter on April 4th, 2015 @ 5:51am CDT
Posted by Lockdownhunter on April 4th, 2015 @ 5:51am CDT
"Ever been to Nuon city?"
"No"
"THAT'S 'CAUSE I ATE IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
By the way,why doesn't Steeljaw use his three bladed claw weapon?
"No"
"THAT'S 'CAUSE I ATE IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
By the way,why doesn't Steeljaw use his three bladed claw weapon?
Re: Transformers: Robots In Disguise New Decepticon Character Scuzzard Revealed (1671002)
Posted by Sabrblade on April 4th, 2015 @ 8:01am CDT
Posted by Sabrblade on April 4th, 2015 @ 8:01am CDT
If anyone who's been waiting for Cartoon Network USA to air it wants to talk about it, episode 3 aired this morning.
Re: Transformers: Robots In Disguise New Decepticon Character Scuzzard Revealed (1671047)
Posted by Archanubis on April 4th, 2015 @ 10:47am CDT
A lot of Steeljaw's video seems to feature scenes from episodes that don't appear to have aired yet.
Posted by Archanubis on April 4th, 2015 @ 10:47am CDT
Sabrblade wrote:That footage of Airazor and Divebomb riding on Steeljaw's altmode is from a post-episode 13 episode.
A lot of Steeljaw's video seems to feature scenes from episodes that don't appear to have aired yet.
Re: Transformers: Robots In Disguise New Decepticon Character Scuzzard Revealed (1671050)
Posted by Sabrblade on April 4th, 2015 @ 10:51am CDT
Posted by Sabrblade on April 4th, 2015 @ 10:51am CDT
I get the feeling that it might have been something the toy designers came up with that the animators didn't.Lockdownhunter wrote:By the way,why doesn't Steeljaw use his three bladed claw weapon?
Re: Transformers: Robots In Disguise New Decepticon Character Scuzzard Revealed (1671054)
Posted by Archanubis on April 4th, 2015 @ 11:03am CDT
Could it have been disabled when he was caught? That being said, none of the other Decepticons seem to have had their powers and weapons disabled when they were incarcerated, but considering Steeljaw's personality and the fact he's arguably the most dangerous Decepticon we've met so far, I can see the ones who imprisoned him going the extra mile to keep him contained.
Then again, it's possible that the animated considered his "Wolverine claws" superfluous, considering he's got claws hands. Or the initial designs Hasbro gave them lacked that feature.
Posted by Archanubis on April 4th, 2015 @ 11:03am CDT
Sabrblade wrote:I get the feeling that it might have been something the toy designers came up with that the animators didn't.Lockdownhunter wrote:By the way,why doesn't Steeljaw use his three bladed claw weapon?
Could it have been disabled when he was caught? That being said, none of the other Decepticons seem to have had their powers and weapons disabled when they were incarcerated, but considering Steeljaw's personality and the fact he's arguably the most dangerous Decepticon we've met so far, I can see the ones who imprisoned him going the extra mile to keep him contained.
Then again, it's possible that the animated considered his "Wolverine claws" superfluous, considering he's got claws hands. Or the initial designs Hasbro gave them lacked that feature.
Re: Transformers: Robots In Disguise New Decepticon Character Scuzzard Revealed (1671057)
Posted by Sabrblade on April 4th, 2015 @ 11:09am CDT
Posted by Sabrblade on April 4th, 2015 @ 11:09am CDT
Think Animated Lugnut's mace weapon. It was a creation of the toy designers instead of the animators who came up with Lugnut's show design before the toy design was made. Same could be said for Steeljaw's claw weapon since the show design likely came first here too.
Re: Transformers: Robots In Disguise New Decepticon Character Scuzzard Revealed (1671070)
Posted by Shadowman on April 4th, 2015 @ 11:59am CDT
Who's "positive review" referred to it as a "kiddie show"?
Also, why do you have to watch TV shows? What exactly is on the line that it makes it a requirement? Because I've certainly never watched television out of necessity.
Posted by Shadowman on April 4th, 2015 @ 11:59am CDT
Ironhidensh wrote:Just isn't my cup of tea, you know? I might finally be out growing kiddie shows. My free time is very limited and this show has nothing appealing to me to watch it over the many other shows I have to watch. I'll see if my boys like it, and maybe give it a chance then.
Who's "positive review" referred to it as a "kiddie show"?
Also, why do you have to watch TV shows? What exactly is on the line that it makes it a requirement? Because I've certainly never watched television out of necessity.
Re: Transformers: Robots In Disguise New Decepticon Character Scuzzard Revealed (1671140)
Posted by chuckdawg1999 on April 4th, 2015 @ 5:07pm CDT
That explains why the pilot wasn't up, they re-aired the episodes individually. Hopefully the turn around to get it up On Demand won't be that long. Thus far like most recent TF toons I'm more into the toys than the show.
Posted by chuckdawg1999 on April 4th, 2015 @ 5:07pm CDT
Sabrblade wrote:If anyone who's been waiting for Cartoon Network USA to air it wants to talk about it, episode 3 aired this morning.
That explains why the pilot wasn't up, they re-aired the episodes individually. Hopefully the turn around to get it up On Demand won't be that long. Thus far like most recent TF toons I'm more into the toys than the show.
Re: Transformers: Robots In Disguise New Decepticon Character Scuzzard Revealed (1671215)
Posted by dragons on April 4th, 2015 @ 9:15pm CDT
member actulay said that should take some consideration in some thought transformers rid kiddie show fasn of seibertron buy transformers which are toys kid related
Posted by dragons on April 4th, 2015 @ 9:15pm CDT
Shadowman wrote:Ironhidensh wrote:Just isn't my cup of tea, you know? I might finally be out growing kiddie shows. My free time is very limited and this show has nothing appealing to me to watch it over the many other shows I have to watch. I'll see if my boys like it, and maybe give it a chance then.
Who's "positive review" referred to it as a "kiddie show"?
Also, why do you have to watch TV shows? What exactly is on the line that it makes it a requirement? Because I've certainly never watched television out of necessity.
member actulay said that should take some consideration in some thought transformers rid kiddie show fasn of seibertron buy transformers which are toys kid related
Re: Transformers: Robots In Disguise New Decepticon Character Scuzzard Revealed (1671230)
Posted by Ironhidensh on April 4th, 2015 @ 9:40pm CDT
I have them on my dvr. They are the shows I would rather watch if/when I have the mythical thing called "free time". Nobody is forcing me to do a damned thing. I'm a grown-ass man, and I can do whatever the hell I want as long as my wife gives me permission.
"Kiddie show" is how I have interpreted all discriptions. If that disappoints you or hurts your feelings, well, I'm not sorry and I don't feel bad, but I'm willing to fake that if it puts a smile on your face, sunshine.
Posted by Ironhidensh on April 4th, 2015 @ 9:40pm CDT
Shadowman wrote:Ironhidensh wrote:Just isn't my cup of tea, you know? I might finally be out growing kiddie shows. My free time is very limited and this show has nothing appealing to me to watch it over the many other shows I have to watch. I'll see if my boys like it, and maybe give it a chance then.
Who's "positive review" referred to it as a "kiddie show"?
Also, why do you have to watch TV shows? What exactly is on the line that it makes it a requirement? Because I've certainly never watched television out of necessity.
I have them on my dvr. They are the shows I would rather watch if/when I have the mythical thing called "free time". Nobody is forcing me to do a damned thing. I'm a grown-ass man, and I can do whatever the hell I want as long as my wife gives me permission.
"Kiddie show" is how I have interpreted all discriptions. If that disappoints you or hurts your feelings, well, I'm not sorry and I don't feel bad, but I'm willing to fake that if it puts a smile on your face, sunshine.
Re: Transformers: Robots In Disguise New Decepticon Character Scuzzard Revealed (1671251)
Posted by william-james88 on April 4th, 2015 @ 11:14pm CDT
Posted by william-james88 on April 4th, 2015 @ 11:14pm CDT
Anyone know why Ped was called Ped?
Unlike what others thought, I was not too thrilled with his voice. Quite annoying and whiny. I know thats the point, but it doesnt make it any more enjoyable to hear.
Unlike what others thought, I was not too thrilled with his voice. Quite annoying and whiny. I know thats the point, but it doesnt make it any more enjoyable to hear.
Re: Transformers: Robots In Disguise New Decepticon Character Scuzzard Revealed (1671297)
Posted by Shadowman on April 5th, 2015 @ 3:46am CDT
First off, pop a chill pill before you pop a blood vessel.
Second, if being a kid's show bothers you, you should probably get off this site dedicated to kid's shows.
Third, I do like how you're trying to change the context of "the other shows I have to watch." I mean, I already know you're making up points to try and justify a book by it's cover, but really...
Posted by Shadowman on April 5th, 2015 @ 3:46am CDT
Ironhidensh wrote:Shadowman wrote:Ironhidensh wrote:Just isn't my cup of tea, you know? I might finally be out growing kiddie shows. My free time is very limited and this show has nothing appealing to me to watch it over the many other shows I have to watch. I'll see if my boys like it, and maybe give it a chance then.
Who's "positive review" referred to it as a "kiddie show"?
Also, why do you have to watch TV shows? What exactly is on the line that it makes it a requirement? Because I've certainly never watched television out of necessity.
I have them on my dvr. They are the shows I would rather watch if/when I have the mythical thing called "free time". Nobody is forcing me to do a damned thing. I'm a grown-ass man, and I can do whatever the hell I want as long as my wife gives me permission.
"Kiddie show" is how I have interpreted all discriptions. If that disappoints you or hurts your feelings, well, I'm not sorry and I don't feel bad, but I'm willing to fake that if it puts a smile on your face, sunshine.
First off, pop a chill pill before you pop a blood vessel.
Second, if being a kid's show bothers you, you should probably get off this site dedicated to kid's shows.
Third, I do like how you're trying to change the context of "the other shows I have to watch." I mean, I already know you're making up points to try and justify a book by it's cover, but really...
Re: Transformers: Robots In Disguise New Decepticon Character Scuzzard Revealed (1671347)
Posted by Sabrblade on April 5th, 2015 @ 8:42am CDT
As for his voice, ever watch Dexter's Laboratory?
Posted by Sabrblade on April 5th, 2015 @ 8:42am CDT
A ped is a soil particle, and he burrows through the ground.william-james88 wrote:Anyone know why Ped was called Ped?
Unlike what others thought, I was not too thrilled with his voice. Quite annoying and whiny. I know thats the point, but it doesnt make it any more enjoyable to hear.
As for his voice, ever watch Dexter's Laboratory?
Re: Transformers: Robots In Disguise New Decepticon Character Scuzzard Revealed (1671360)
Posted by Dead Metal on April 5th, 2015 @ 9:21am CDT
Kinda like when you made up your mind about Beware the Batman before watching it, simply based on promo material?
Or are you the only one who is allowed to do that?
Posted by Dead Metal on April 5th, 2015 @ 9:21am CDT
Shadowman wrote:Ironhidensh wrote:Shadowman wrote:Ironhidensh wrote:Just isn't my cup of tea, you know? I might finally be out growing kiddie shows. My free time is very limited and this show has nothing appealing to me to watch it over the many other shows I have to watch. I'll see if my boys like it, and maybe give it a chance then.
Who's "positive review" referred to it as a "kiddie show"?
Also, why do you have to watch TV shows? What exactly is on the line that it makes it a requirement? Because I've certainly never watched television out of necessity.
I have them on my dvr. They are the shows I would rather watch if/when I have the mythical thing called "free time". Nobody is forcing me to do a damned thing. I'm a grown-ass man, and I can do whatever the hell I want as long as my wife gives me permission.
"Kiddie show" is how I have interpreted all discriptions. If that disappoints you or hurts your feelings, well, I'm not sorry and I don't feel bad, but I'm willing to fake that if it puts a smile on your face, sunshine.
First off, pop a chill pill before you pop a blood vessel.
Second, if being a kid's show bothers you, you should probably get off this site dedicated to kid's shows.
Third, I do like how you're trying to change the context of "the other shows I have to watch." I mean, I already know you're making up points to try and justify a book by it's cover, but really...
Kinda like when you made up your mind about Beware the Batman before watching it, simply based on promo material?
Or are you the only one who is allowed to do that?
Re: Transformers: Robots In Disguise New Decepticon Character Scuzzard Revealed (1671374)
Posted by Shadowman on April 5th, 2015 @ 10:02am CDT
No, but then again, I don't expect you to have understood the actually very legitimate reasons I didn't like the show.
The key difference here is that I didn't reject the show because I thought I understood the overall tone of it based off of positive reviews a forum. I rejected it because the art style was godawful, they knowingly declined to use the best characters of the franchise, and those they did use were so heavily altered they ended up unrecognizable at best. (Anarky, for instance, was never actually on the show) The episodes I did watch (And I told you I watched it) I couldn't stand.
I rejected the show because they fucked up Batman and bragged about it.
But it doesn't shock me you can't tell the difference.
Posted by Shadowman on April 5th, 2015 @ 10:02am CDT
Dead Metal wrote:Shadowman wrote:Ironhidensh wrote:Shadowman wrote:Ironhidensh wrote:Just isn't my cup of tea, you know? I might finally be out growing kiddie shows. My free time is very limited and this show has nothing appealing to me to watch it over the many other shows I have to watch. I'll see if my boys like it, and maybe give it a chance then.
Who's "positive review" referred to it as a "kiddie show"?
Also, why do you have to watch TV shows? What exactly is on the line that it makes it a requirement? Because I've certainly never watched television out of necessity.
I have them on my dvr. They are the shows I would rather watch if/when I have the mythical thing called "free time". Nobody is forcing me to do a damned thing. I'm a grown-ass man, and I can do whatever the hell I want as long as my wife gives me permission.
"Kiddie show" is how I have interpreted all discriptions. If that disappoints you or hurts your feelings, well, I'm not sorry and I don't feel bad, but I'm willing to fake that if it puts a smile on your face, sunshine.
First off, pop a chill pill before you pop a blood vessel.
Second, if being a kid's show bothers you, you should probably get off this site dedicated to kid's shows.
Third, I do like how you're trying to change the context of "the other shows I have to watch." I mean, I already know you're making up points to try and justify a book by it's cover, but really...
Kinda like when you made up your mind about Beware the Batman before watching it, simply based on promo material?
Or are you the only one who is allowed to do that?
No, but then again, I don't expect you to have understood the actually very legitimate reasons I didn't like the show.
The key difference here is that I didn't reject the show because I thought I understood the overall tone of it based off of positive reviews a forum. I rejected it because the art style was godawful, they knowingly declined to use the best characters of the franchise, and those they did use were so heavily altered they ended up unrecognizable at best. (Anarky, for instance, was never actually on the show) The episodes I did watch (And I told you I watched it) I couldn't stand.
I rejected the show because they fucked up Batman and bragged about it.
But it doesn't shock me you can't tell the difference.
Re: Transformers: Robots In Disguise New Decepticon Character Scuzzard Revealed (1671376)
Posted by william-james88 on April 5th, 2015 @ 10:06am CDT
Yeah, is he Dexter? Also, was he supposed to be a worm? His face looked like a killer whale to me.
I was really surprised with his transformation, I doubt they could make a decent toy with him since both modes looked way too different to result in one another in the simple transformation hasbro wants with these toys.
Posted by william-james88 on April 5th, 2015 @ 10:06am CDT
Sabrblade wrote:A ped is a soil particle, and he burrows through the ground.william-james88 wrote:Anyone know why Ped was called Ped?
Unlike what others thought, I was not too thrilled with his voice. Quite annoying and whiny. I know thats the point, but it doesnt make it any more enjoyable to hear.
As for his voice, ever watch Dexter's Laboratory?
Yeah, is he Dexter? Also, was he supposed to be a worm? His face looked like a killer whale to me.
I was really surprised with his transformation, I doubt they could make a decent toy with him since both modes looked way too different to result in one another in the simple transformation hasbro wants with these toys.
Re: Transformers: Robots In Disguise New Decepticon Character Scuzzard Revealed (1671411)
Posted by Dead Metal on April 5th, 2015 @ 12:11pm CDT
Oh look, so the difference is that while he stated it's OK for his kids but not something he'd be interested in, you went into a fanboy rage, which justifies everything.
Got it
Posted by Dead Metal on April 5th, 2015 @ 12:11pm CDT
Shadowman wrote:Dead Metal wrote:Shadowman wrote:Ironhidensh wrote:Shadowman wrote:Ironhidensh wrote:Just isn't my cup of tea, you know? I might finally be out growing kiddie shows. My free time is very limited and this show has nothing appealing to me to watch it over the many other shows I have to watch. I'll see if my boys like it, and maybe give it a chance then.
Who's "positive review" referred to it as a "kiddie show"?
Also, why do you have to watch TV shows? What exactly is on the line that it makes it a requirement? Because I've certainly never watched television out of necessity.
I have them on my dvr. They are the shows I would rather watch if/when I have the mythical thing called "free time". Nobody is forcing me to do a damned thing. I'm a grown-ass man, and I can do whatever the hell I want as long as my wife gives me permission.
"Kiddie show" is how I have interpreted all discriptions. If that disappoints you or hurts your feelings, well, I'm not sorry and I don't feel bad, but I'm willing to fake that if it puts a smile on your face, sunshine.
First off, pop a chill pill before you pop a blood vessel.
Second, if being a kid's show bothers you, you should probably get off this site dedicated to kid's shows.
Third, I do like how you're trying to change the context of "the other shows I have to watch." I mean, I already know you're making up points to try and justify a book by it's cover, but really...
Kinda like when you made up your mind about Beware the Batman before watching it, simply based on promo material?
Or are you the only one who is allowed to do that?
No, but then again, I don't expect you to have understood the actually very legitimate reasons I didn't like the show.
The key difference here is that I didn't reject the show because I thought I understood the overall tone of it based off of positive reviews a forum. I rejected it because the art style was godawful, they knowingly declined to use the best characters of the franchise, and those they did use were so heavily altered they ended up unrecognizable at best. (Anarky, for instance, was never actually on the show) The episodes I did watch (And I told you I watched it) I couldn't stand.
I rejected the show because they **** up Batman and bragged about it.
But it doesn't shock me you can't tell the difference.
Oh look, so the difference is that while he stated it's OK for his kids but not something he'd be interested in, you went into a fanboy rage, which justifies everything.
Got it
Re: Transformers: Robots In Disguise New Decepticon Character Scuzzard Revealed (1671412)
Posted by dreadwing95 on April 5th, 2015 @ 12:11pm CDT
peds actor played dexters evil rival mandark and believe it or not its his actual voice no changes or anything
Posted by dreadwing95 on April 5th, 2015 @ 12:11pm CDT
william-james88 wrote:Sabrblade wrote:A ped is a soil particle, and he burrows through the ground.william-james88 wrote:Anyone know why Ped was called Ped?
Unlike what others thought, I was not too thrilled with his voice. Quite annoying and whiny. I know thats the point, but it doesnt make it any more enjoyable to hear.
As for his voice, ever watch Dexter's Laboratory?
Yeah, is he Dexter? Also, was he supposed to be a worm? His face looked like a killer whale to me.
I was really surprised with his transformation, I doubt they could make a decent toy with him since both modes looked way too different to result in one another in the simple transformation hasbro wants with these toys.
peds actor played dexters evil rival mandark and believe it or not its his actual voice no changes or anything
Re: Transformers: Robots In Disguise New Decepticon Character Scuzzard Revealed (1671419)
Posted by Dead Metal on April 5th, 2015 @ 12:22pm CDT
That's his actual voice? Damn. He probably got made fun of at school, so it's awesome he managed to make a career out of it. It's an excellent voice for cartoons.
Posted by Dead Metal on April 5th, 2015 @ 12:22pm CDT
dreadwing95 wrote:william-james88 wrote:Sabrblade wrote:A ped is a soil particle, and he burrows through the ground.william-james88 wrote:Anyone know why Ped was called Ped?
Unlike what others thought, I was not too thrilled with his voice. Quite annoying and whiny. I know thats the point, but it doesnt make it any more enjoyable to hear.
As for his voice, ever watch Dexter's Laboratory?
Yeah, is he Dexter? Also, was he supposed to be a worm? His face looked like a killer whale to me.
I was really surprised with his transformation, I doubt they could make a decent toy with him since both modes looked way too different to result in one another in the simple transformation hasbro wants with these toys.
peds actor played dexters evil rival mandark and believe it or not its his actual voice no changes or anything
That's his actual voice? Damn. He probably got made fun of at school, so it's awesome he managed to make a career out of it. It's an excellent voice for cartoons.
Re: Transformers: Robots In Disguise New Decepticon Character Scuzzard Revealed (1671427)
Posted by Shadowman on April 5th, 2015 @ 12:43pm CDT
Do you have to practice being this dense or does it just come naturally?
Posted by Shadowman on April 5th, 2015 @ 12:43pm CDT
Dead Metal wrote:Shadowman wrote:Dead Metal wrote:Shadowman wrote:Ironhidensh wrote:Shadowman wrote:Ironhidensh wrote:Just isn't my cup of tea, you know? I might finally be out growing kiddie shows. My free time is very limited and this show has nothing appealing to me to watch it over the many other shows I have to watch. I'll see if my boys like it, and maybe give it a chance then.
Who's "positive review" referred to it as a "kiddie show"?
Also, why do you have to watch TV shows? What exactly is on the line that it makes it a requirement? Because I've certainly never watched television out of necessity.
I have them on my dvr. They are the shows I would rather watch if/when I have the mythical thing called "free time". Nobody is forcing me to do a damned thing. I'm a grown-ass man, and I can do whatever the hell I want as long as my wife gives me permission.
"Kiddie show" is how I have interpreted all discriptions. If that disappoints you or hurts your feelings, well, I'm not sorry and I don't feel bad, but I'm willing to fake that if it puts a smile on your face, sunshine.
First off, pop a chill pill before you pop a blood vessel.
Second, if being a kid's show bothers you, you should probably get off this site dedicated to kid's shows.
Third, I do like how you're trying to change the context of "the other shows I have to watch." I mean, I already know you're making up points to try and justify a book by it's cover, but really...
Kinda like when you made up your mind about Beware the Batman before watching it, simply based on promo material?
Or are you the only one who is allowed to do that?
No, but then again, I don't expect you to have understood the actually very legitimate reasons I didn't like the show.
The key difference here is that I didn't reject the show because I thought I understood the overall tone of it based off of positive reviews a forum. I rejected it because the art style was godawful, they knowingly declined to use the best characters of the franchise, and those they did use were so heavily altered they ended up unrecognizable at best. (Anarky, for instance, was never actually on the show) The episodes I did watch (And I told you I watched it) I couldn't stand.
I rejected the show because they **** up Batman and bragged about it.
But it doesn't shock me you can't tell the difference.
Oh look, so the difference is that while he stated it's OK for his kids but not something he'd be interested in, you went into a fanboy rage, which justifies everything.
Got it
Do you have to practice being this dense or does it just come naturally?
Re: Transformers: Robots In Disguise New Decepticon Character Scuzzard Revealed (1671437)
Posted by Dead Metal on April 5th, 2015 @ 12:57pm CDT
I don't know, you tell me. How am I supposed to know how you function?
Posted by Dead Metal on April 5th, 2015 @ 12:57pm CDT
Shadowman wrote:Dead Metal wrote:Shadowman wrote:Dead Metal wrote:Shadowman wrote:Ironhidensh wrote:Shadowman wrote:Ironhidensh wrote:Just isn't my cup of tea, you know? I might finally be out growing kiddie shows. My free time is very limited and this show has nothing appealing to me to watch it over the many other shows I have to watch. I'll see if my boys like it, and maybe give it a chance then.
Who's "positive review" referred to it as a "kiddie show"?
Also, why do you have to watch TV shows? What exactly is on the line that it makes it a requirement? Because I've certainly never watched television out of necessity.
I have them on my dvr. They are the shows I would rather watch if/when I have the mythical thing called "free time". Nobody is forcing me to do a damned thing. I'm a grown-ass man, and I can do whatever the hell I want as long as my wife gives me permission.
"Kiddie show" is how I have interpreted all discriptions. If that disappoints you or hurts your feelings, well, I'm not sorry and I don't feel bad, but I'm willing to fake that if it puts a smile on your face, sunshine.
First off, pop a chill pill before you pop a blood vessel.
Second, if being a kid's show bothers you, you should probably get off this site dedicated to kid's shows.
Third, I do like how you're trying to change the context of "the other shows I have to watch." I mean, I already know you're making up points to try and justify a book by it's cover, but really...
Kinda like when you made up your mind about Beware the Batman before watching it, simply based on promo material?
Or are you the only one who is allowed to do that?
No, but then again, I don't expect you to have understood the actually very legitimate reasons I didn't like the show.
The key difference here is that I didn't reject the show because I thought I understood the overall tone of it based off of positive reviews a forum. I rejected it because the art style was godawful, they knowingly declined to use the best characters of the franchise, and those they did use were so heavily altered they ended up unrecognizable at best. (Anarky, for instance, was never actually on the show) The episodes I did watch (And I told you I watched it) I couldn't stand.
I rejected the show because they **** up Batman and bragged about it.
But it doesn't shock me you can't tell the difference.
Oh look, so the difference is that while he stated it's OK for his kids but not something he'd be interested in, you went into a fanboy rage, which justifies everything.
Got it
Do you have to practice being this dense or does it just come naturally?
I don't know, you tell me. How am I supposed to know how you function?
Re: Transformers: Robots In Disguise New Decepticon Character Scuzzard Revealed (1671455)
Posted by Shadowman on April 5th, 2015 @ 1:29pm CDT
Well that answers my question pretty nicely. I mean, I already knew, I've read enough of your posts to know you rarely ever think logically about anything.
Posted by Shadowman on April 5th, 2015 @ 1:29pm CDT
Dead Metal wrote:Shadowman wrote:Do you have to practice being this dense or does it just come naturally?
I don't know, you tell me. How am I supposed to know how you function?
Well that answers my question pretty nicely. I mean, I already knew, I've read enough of your posts to know you rarely ever think logically about anything.
Re: Transformers: Robots In Disguise New Decepticon Character Scuzzard Revealed (1671630)
Posted by Ironhidensh on April 5th, 2015 @ 11:44pm CDT
I think you need to get your eyes checked. You appear to be reading things that I never typed.
Kid's shows don't bother me. I freaking love the new Star Wars Rebels show. See, I have this thing called a 'personal opinion'. This might shock you, but I'm not going to enjoy every single thing that you enjoy. This show is one of those things. It doesn't appeal to me at this point.
Also, I'm not justifying anything. I'm straight out judging this book by its cover. Same thing every other single human does. I've also said several times that when and if I put this show on for my kids, I'll probably give it a chance then.
I'm having a hard time understanding why my lack of interest in this show is bothering you so much? Are you bored? Perhaps you need to take your gentleman parts, find some nice lady parts, and have them hang out together for a while? It might do you some good, relieve some stress.
Posted by Ironhidensh on April 5th, 2015 @ 11:44pm CDT
Shadowman wrote:Ironhidensh wrote:Shadowman wrote:Ironhidensh wrote:Just isn't my cup of tea, you know? I might finally be out growing kiddie shows. My free time is very limited and this show has nothing appealing to me to watch it over the many other shows I have to watch. I'll see if my boys like it, and maybe give it a chance then.
Who's "positive review" referred to it as a "kiddie show"?
Also, why do you have to watch TV shows? What exactly is on the line that it makes it a requirement? Because I've certainly never watched television out of necessity.
I have them on my dvr. They are the shows I would rather watch if/when I have the mythical thing called "free time". Nobody is forcing me to do a damned thing. I'm a grown-ass man, and I can do whatever the hell I want as long as my wife gives me permission.
"Kiddie show" is how I have interpreted all descriptions. If that disappoints you or hurts your feelings, well, I'm not sorry and I don't feel bad, but I'm willing to fake that if it puts a smile on your face, sunshine.
First off, pop a chill pill before you pop a blood vessel.
Second, if being a kid's show bothers you, you should probably get off this site dedicated to kid's shows.
Third, I do like how you're trying to change the context of "the other shows I have to watch." I mean, I already know you're making up points to try and justify a book by it's cover, but really...
I think you need to get your eyes checked. You appear to be reading things that I never typed.
Kid's shows don't bother me. I freaking love the new Star Wars Rebels show. See, I have this thing called a 'personal opinion'. This might shock you, but I'm not going to enjoy every single thing that you enjoy. This show is one of those things. It doesn't appeal to me at this point.
Also, I'm not justifying anything. I'm straight out judging this book by its cover. Same thing every other single human does. I've also said several times that when and if I put this show on for my kids, I'll probably give it a chance then.
I'm having a hard time understanding why my lack of interest in this show is bothering you so much? Are you bored? Perhaps you need to take your gentleman parts, find some nice lady parts, and have them hang out together for a while? It might do you some good, relieve some stress.
Re: Transformers: Robots In Disguise New Decepticon Character Scuzzard Revealed (1671645)
Posted by Lockdownhunter on April 6th, 2015 @ 1:01am CDT
Well,ped means foot in latin or greek,cannot remember which.Maybe they called him foot because even to the he is lousy.His voice was totally unexpected!I was expecting a vengeful voice not a whiny one.
Posted by Lockdownhunter on April 6th, 2015 @ 1:01am CDT
william-james88 wrote:Anyone know why Ped was called Ped?
Unlike what others thought, I was not too thrilled with his voice. Quite annoying and whiny. I know thats the point, but it doesnt make it any more enjoyable to hear.
Well,ped means foot in latin or greek,cannot remember which.Maybe they called him foot because even to the
he is lousy.His voice was totally unexpected!I was expecting a vengeful voice not a whiny one.
Re: Transformers: Robots In Disguise New Decepticon Character Scuzzard Revealed (1671648)
Posted by Sabrblade on April 6th, 2015 @ 1:16am CDT
Posted by Sabrblade on April 6th, 2015 @ 1:16am CDT
Lockdownhunter wrote:william-james88 wrote:Anyone know why Ped was called Ped?
Unlike what others thought, I was not too thrilled with his voice. Quite annoying and whiny. I know thats the point, but it doesnt make it any more enjoyable to hear.
Well,ped means foot in latin or greek,cannot remember which.Maybe they called him foot because even to the
Sabrblade wrote:A ped is a soil particle, and he burrows through the ground.william-james88 wrote:Anyone know why Ped was called Ped?
Unlike what others thought, I was not too thrilled with his voice. Quite annoying and whiny. I know thats the point, but it doesnt make it any more enjoyable to hear.
Re: Transformers: Robots In Disguise New Decepticon Character Scuzzard Revealed (1671657)
Posted by Dead Metal on April 6th, 2015 @ 2:09am CDT
It's nothing against you personally or even about you having a personal opinion on something. It's just that one ever month or two Shadowman feels awful about himself or something and just picks on someone at random for completely arbitrary reasons. And he really doesn't care what it's about.
My personal theory is that he's frustrated about having to hide his sexuality from his friends and family. Really, you should feel sorry for him, I do.
Posted by Dead Metal on April 6th, 2015 @ 2:09am CDT
Ironhidensh wrote:Shadowman wrote:Ironhidensh wrote:Shadowman wrote:Ironhidensh wrote:Just isn't my cup of tea, you know? I might finally be out growing kiddie shows. My free time is very limited and this show has nothing appealing to me to watch it over the many other shows I have to watch. I'll see if my boys like it, and maybe give it a chance then.
Who's "positive review" referred to it as a "kiddie show"?
Also, why do you have to watch TV shows? What exactly is on the line that it makes it a requirement? Because I've certainly never watched television out of necessity.
I have them on my dvr. They are the shows I would rather watch if/when I have the mythical thing called "free time". Nobody is forcing me to do a damned thing. I'm a grown-ass man, and I can do whatever the hell I want as long as my wife gives me permission.
"Kiddie show" is how I have interpreted all descriptions. If that disappoints you or hurts your feelings, well, I'm not sorry and I don't feel bad, but I'm willing to fake that if it puts a smile on your face, sunshine.
First off, pop a chill pill before you pop a blood vessel.
Second, if being a kid's show bothers you, you should probably get off this site dedicated to kid's shows.
Third, I do like how you're trying to change the context of "the other shows I have to watch." I mean, I already know you're making up points to try and justify a book by it's cover, but really...
I think you need to get your eyes checked. You appear to be reading things that I never typed.
Kid's shows don't bother me. I freaking love the new Star Wars Rebels show. See, I have this thing called a 'personal opinion'. This might shock you, but I'm not going to enjoy every single thing that you enjoy. This show is one of those things. It doesn't appeal to me at this point.
Also, I'm not justifying anything. I'm straight out judging this book by its cover. Same thing every other single human does. I've also said several times that when and if I put this show on for my kids, I'll probably give it a chance then.
I'm having a hard time understanding why my lack of interest in this show is bothering you so much? Are you bored? Perhaps you need to take your gentleman parts, find some nice lady parts, and have them hang out together for a while? It might do you some good, relieve some stress.
It's nothing against you personally or even about you having a personal opinion on something. It's just that one ever month or two Shadowman feels awful about himself or something and just picks on someone at random for completely arbitrary reasons. And he really doesn't care what it's about.
My personal theory is that he's frustrated about having to hide his sexuality from his friends and family. Really, you should feel sorry for him, I do.
Re: Transformers: Robots In Disguise New Decepticon Character Scuzzard Revealed (1671696)
Posted by TurboMMaster on April 6th, 2015 @ 6:39am CDT
Posted by TurboMMaster on April 6th, 2015 @ 6:39am CDT
I'm already kinda tired of this "Monster of the week" formula, they should offer us something different very soon. I hope that in next few episodes there will be some plot not centered about ne Con, but Steeljaw could bring some Megatron-like plan.
Also, it is strange that usually one Decepticon is able to fight all bots on his own, yet in 5 on 5 battle Autobots seems to be superior. It isn't problem for me that Aboutots are getting stronger, but there should be something between.
Also, it is strange that usually one Decepticon is able to fight all bots on his own, yet in 5 on 5 battle Autobots seems to be superior. It isn't problem for me that Aboutots are getting stronger, but there should be something between.
Re: Transformers: Robots In Disguise New Decepticon Character Scuzzard Revealed (1671714)
Posted by Shadowman on April 6th, 2015 @ 8:14am CDT
...no, no that's just what stupid people do.
I like telling people when they've made stupid posts. You should know that by now.
Posted by Shadowman on April 6th, 2015 @ 8:14am CDT
Ironhidensh wrote:Also, I'm not justifying anything. I'm straight out judging this book by its cover. Same thing every other single human does.
...no, no that's just what stupid people do.
Ironhidensh wrote:I'm having a hard time understanding why my lack of interest in this show is bothering you so much? Are you bored? Perhaps you need to take your gentleman parts, find some nice lady parts, and have them hang out together for a while? It might do you some good, relieve some stress.
I like telling people when they've made stupid posts. You should know that by now.
Re: Transformers: Robots In Disguise New Decepticon Character Scuzzard Revealed (1671718)
Posted by Ironhidensh on April 6th, 2015 @ 8:24am CDT
Well son, one day you'll leave your moms basement, start to develop a real life, and grow out of being an asshat. We all hope, at least.
Posted by Ironhidensh on April 6th, 2015 @ 8:24am CDT
Shadowman wrote:Ironhidensh wrote:Also, I'm not justifying anything. I'm straight out judging this book by its cover. Same thing every other single human does.
...no, no that's just what stupid people do.Ironhidensh wrote:I'm having a hard time understanding why my lack of interest in this show is bothering you so much? Are you bored? Perhaps you need to take your gentleman parts, find some nice lady parts, and have them hang out together for a while? It might do you some good, relieve some stress.
I like telling people when they've made stupid posts. You should know that by now.
Well son, one day you'll leave your moms basement, start to develop a real life, and grow out of being an asshat. We all hope, at least.
Re: Transformers: Robots In Disguise New Decepticon Character Scuzzard Revealed (1671722)
Posted by Shadowman on April 6th, 2015 @ 8:29am CDT
Cute. Even cuter is that it's blatant compensation.
Posted by Shadowman on April 6th, 2015 @ 8:29am CDT
Ironhidensh wrote:Shadowman wrote:Ironhidensh wrote:Also, I'm not justifying anything. I'm straight out judging this book by its cover. Same thing every other single human does.
...no, no that's just what stupid people do.Ironhidensh wrote:I'm having a hard time understanding why my lack of interest in this show is bothering you so much? Are you bored? Perhaps you need to take your gentleman parts, find some nice lady parts, and have them hang out together for a while? It might do you some good, relieve some stress.
I like telling people when they've made stupid posts. You should know that by now.
Well son, one day you'll leave your moms basement, start to develop a real life, and grow out of being an asshat. We all hope, at least.
Cute. Even cuter is that it's blatant compensation.
Re: Transformers: Robots In Disguise New Decepticon Character Scuzzard Revealed (1671727)
Posted by Shadowman on April 6th, 2015 @ 8:36am CDT
So...which is it? Is it not your cup of tea because it's a "kiddie show" or does that aspect not bother you at all?
Posted by Shadowman on April 6th, 2015 @ 8:36am CDT
Ironhidensh wrote:Just isn't my cup of tea, you know? I might finally be out growing kiddie shows.
Ironhidensh wrote:Kid's shows don't bother me. I freaking love the new Star Wars Rebels show.
So...which is it? Is it not your cup of tea because it's a "kiddie show" or does that aspect not bother you at all?
Re: Transformers: Robots In Disguise New Decepticon Character Scuzzard Revealed (1671745)
Posted by Va'al on April 6th, 2015 @ 9:22am CDT
Posted by Va'al on April 6th, 2015 @ 9:22am CDT
Moderator warning: any further attacks between users will result in warnings to all people involved. Disagreement in conversation can happen without resorting to personal insults. Thank you.
Re: Transformers: Robots In Disguise New Decepticon Character Scuzzard Revealed (1671865)
Posted by Ironhidensh on April 6th, 2015 @ 1:55pm CDT
Kids shows don't bother me, kiddie shows do. That doesn't mean it's a bad show, just one that I, at this time, and based on the reviews of people on here who like it, do not care to watch. That's it.
I don't see the issue here?
there, no insults.
Posted by Ironhidensh on April 6th, 2015 @ 1:55pm CDT
Shadowman wrote:Ironhidensh wrote:Just isn't my cup of tea, you know? I might finally be out growing kiddie shows.Ironhidensh wrote:Kid's shows don't bother me. I freaking love the new Star Wars Rebels show.
So...which is it? Is it not your cup of tea because it's a "kiddie show" or does that aspect not bother you at all?
Kids shows don't bother me, kiddie shows do. That doesn't mean it's a bad show, just one that I, at this time, and based on the reviews of people on here who like it, do not care to watch. That's it.
I don't see the issue here?
there, no insults.
Re: Transformers: Robots In Disguise New Decepticon Character Scuzzard Revealed (1671873)
Posted by Sabrblade on April 6th, 2015 @ 2:03pm CDT
Posted by Sabrblade on April 6th, 2015 @ 2:03pm CDT
Is there a difference? The word "kiddie" means "of or pertaining to kids". A children's show is a show for children, no matter the age.Ironhidensh wrote:Kids shows don't bother me, kiddie shows do.
Re: Transformers: Robots In Disguise New Decepticon Character Scuzzard Revealed (1671883)
Posted by Ironhidensh on April 6th, 2015 @ 2:20pm CDT
There is a difference to me. A kids show is just a show made for kids. A kiddie show is one that fails to appeal to the older viewer. It's a subjective discription that totally depends on the eye of the beholder.
Posted by Ironhidensh on April 6th, 2015 @ 2:20pm CDT
Sabrblade wrote:Is there a difference? The word "kiddie" means "of or pertaining to kids". A children's show is a show for children, no matter the age.Ironhidensh wrote:Kids shows don't bother me, kiddie shows do.
There is a difference to me. A kids show is just a show made for kids. A kiddie show is one that fails to appeal to the older viewer. It's a subjective discription that totally depends on the eye of the beholder.
