Transformers: The Last Knight Banner Art Appearing in US Cinemas

Sabrblade wrote:The more times I see it in that image, the dragon is starting to look less and less like a robot (as in, a Transformer) to me and more like an energy-based creature instead.

Sabrblade wrote:The more times I see it in that image, the dragon is starting to look less and less like a robot (as in, a Transformer) to me and more like an energy-based creature instead.

Sabrblade wrote:The more times I see it in that image, the dragon is starting to look less and less like a robot (as in, a Transformer) to me and more like an energy-based creature instead.

Shauyaun wrote:So the "last knight" teaser trailer is out so I had two of my TFs watch it








































For more visit MY EPIC COMICS

Rodimus Prime wrote:

Sabrblade wrote:

Rodimus Prime wrote:

Stuartmaximus wrote:

Rodimus Prime wrote:Optimus won't turn evil. It'll be like Hulk was in Age of Ultron and he'll be under someone's control.

Unicron's

I hope so. I'd rather have a badly done Unicron (a la Galactus in FF2) than shitty characters like the Quintessons.

I don't follow that logic. You'd rather they go for an interesting character that they can ruin instead of lousy characters that are already beyond ruining?

Of course I don't want Unicron ruined. And considering the movie universe's track record regarding the ruination of characters, it's a high probability that if new characters appear they will be grossly misused. My point was that the Quintessons are so loathsome to me that even a badly characterized Unicron would be preferred to them. But since the "creators" were not only mentioned but partially shown in Age of Extinction, I think sadly the Quints are coming.

Stuartmaximus wrote:Hey! i saw what you did there! you managed to get ruination into your response

Bleak5170 wrote:

Big Grim wrote:

Ultra Magnus wrote:I doubt I'll even see this one in the theater. Don't think I can take it anymore. Thankfully, IDW has a clue about what it's doing...

After all this time, and how bad AoE was, I admit, I'm in the same boat as you Dude.

Make room on the boat for one more. I'm a fan of the TF flicks in general, (absolutely love the first one), but AoE is simply one of the worst movies I have ever seen in my life. I think my brain checked out about halfway through.

King Kuuga wrote:That's entering Quentin Tarantino or Peter Jackson levels of filmmaking. I don't think Bay has it in him.

ImAWalkingCorpse wrote:AOE was the 2nd best of the series.

In between getting to see Bay work up close for the first time and watching tons of explosions and gunfire, I was able to participate in a group interview with producer Lorenzo di Bonaventura.

During an extended conversation with one of the few people that’s been involved in all the Transformers movies besides Michael Bay, he revealed how The Last Knight came together, how the film explores the Transformers mythology, what’s different about this sequel, how they determine which characters to include, if they listen to the fans when making the films, future sequels, the status of the Bumblebee spinoff, if people need to have seen the first four installments to understand The Last Knight, how Grimlock plays a larger role, their relationship with Hasbro, and so much more. If you’re a fan of Transformers, I promise you’ll love this interview because it’s loaded with info. Check out what he had to say below.

[...]

Are there direct connections, though, that you would see to the Bumblebee spin-off of things in this movie? Does this set things up?

Di Bonaventura: Sometimes is the answer. It’s not always, because I think then it feels like you’re really trying to widget it all together, and it becomes a little too neat. But I think–I don’t think, I know–some of the things will have a very direct relationship. You’ll see some things in here that are laying a pipe. You won’t necessarily know that it’s laying a pipe for another movie, but it’s there.

So there’s probably, in a really meaningful way, two or three things in this movie that really have a meaningful aspect in terms of it, and then there’s a bunch of little things. But we’re not making this movie to set up the other movies. That’s what I’m trying to say. If you get too carried away with that, you stop thinking about this movie.

And this movie, the two lines of mythology in a sense give you freedom to go a lot of different places later on that may or may not directly relate to another movie, but it’s opening up the universe in a way that I think, in that way it’s probably the most provocative, in terms of the movie. It’s opening a really large universe of what Transformers is, and where they’ve come from, and how we relate to them, and how they relate to themselves.

[...]

I’m curious where you guys are at on the Bumblebee?

Di Bonaventura: It’s being written.

Can you say who the writers are?

Di Bonaventura: Christina Hodson is the writer.

Is there a plan–I think it has a release date, if I’m not mistaken.

Di Bonaventura: I think the Paramount release said ’18. I think it said 2018. I don’t know if they put an actual date, but I believe they–honestly, that release came out about 4 months ago, and all I’m trying to do is get it ready as soon as I can!

[...]

Is this one of these movies where–will people have to have seen the first four to enjoy this film?

Di Bonaventura: No, no. That’s another conscious thing. The opening of the film will introduce the sort of exploration of the mythology that we’re going to do. Therefore, it’s not necessary to have seen the films before, because it’s going to establish the–let’s call it the mystery of the movie, and the direction the movie is going to go in.

That was a very conscious attempt, because that’s the other thing you forget as a film maker. Not everybody–you kind of fell like everybody’s seen it, so they can come right along for the ride. So the opening sequence, which is probably–I don’t know, it’s been a while since I counted the pages, but I’ll say ten pages, sets the mystery of the movie, of this movie. If you’ve never seen another Transformers movie, you don’t need to.

[...]

Was that Grimlock being more in the film–was that a nod to fans that wanted to see more Dinobots, or more action with the Dinobots?

Di Bonaventura: I think everybody wanted to see more Dinobots, including ourselves, you know what I mean? We all were like god, we wish we could have found a way in that story to include them more. So that was one of the hopes/priorities going into this, was to try to find a way to bring them back into the stories?

So is it more than Grimlock, or mostly Grimlock?

Di Bonaventura: There’s a few others, but Grimlock is, to me–I like Grimlock the most, so that’s probably why I talk the most about it, you know? And I just saw a sequence, so that’s probably why it’s on the top of my head. He’s funny. He’s like a naughty dog in this movie. He’s really sheepish when he does something wrong. He’s a great character. He’s really–we’re bringing out a side of him that you’re going to like–you’re going to relate to.

[...]

If you’re introducing a new villain, is Galvatron/Megatron still around? Does he play any role in this?

Di Bonaventura: Yeah, Megatron for sure is around. I mean, are we talking about some of the ones that are…

Staffer: You can talk about some of the new ones.

Di Bonaventura: So if you go back in the mythology, how Transformers were actually created, where did it start, where did they go from being a sort of a slave-race to a sentient race–we’re delving into that aspect of the mythology, so the characters that are involved in there are Megatron before he’s Megatron, Optimus before he’s Optimus, the Librarian, the Quintessons, there’s a whole group of things that have to do with how, in a sense, the Transformers were birthed, and also with how they were divided. What brought up the division, and what were the jealousies involved.

So I think on that level, you’re going to deal with things that feel from a stakes level higher, because of the importance of the sort of thought, right? There’s still, of course, the threat to the world and that sort of threat we have, but I think that threat is amplified now, because you’re going to feel why certain aspects of our world, why we’ve been fighting in a sense.

First-Aid wrote:He said the "Q" word...

King Kuuga wrote:That's entering Quentin Tarantino or Peter Jackson levels of filmmaking. I don't think Bay has it in him.

It Is Him wrote:This interview has more character development than the last four movies combined

Megatron before he’s Megatron, Optimus before he’s Optimus, the Librarian, the Quintessons, there’s a whole group of things that have to do with how, in a sense, the Transformers were birthed

Rodimus Prime wrote:Quintessons. Ugh. *pukes*

Rodimus Prime wrote:Quintessons. Ugh. *pukes*

EvasionModeBumblebee wrote:

Rodimus Prime wrote:Quintessons. Ugh. *pukes*

Agreed. I hoped we wouldn't see them in the movies.

william-james88 wrote:

EvasionModeBumblebee wrote:

Rodimus Prime wrote:Quintessons. Ugh. *pukes*

Agreed. I hoped we wouldn't see them in the movies.

To late, we already saw them in the beginning of AOE

Experience the trailer all over again with these awesome fan reactions! #Transformers

Thanks to Isabela Moner, Its11thPlanet, WesSideLive, Gattor Martin, and Tyrone Magnus for their awesome reactions!

Sabrblade wrote:What, no reaction footage of Andre Meadows from Black Nerd Comedy?

SlyTF1 wrote:Another one.
[youtube]UYJylqvPsLM&t[/youtube]

D-Maximus_Prime wrote:

SlyTF1 wrote:Another one.
[youtube]UYJylqvPsLM&t[/youtube]

You're link isn't working here or in the youtube suggestion box.